12/28/2022 0 Comments Osculator mojavePanel 3 - 5 stage Resonator, dual triple channel VCAs, double Jerkoff Chaos, EoE VCF (transistor ladder), ARP/Electronotes style 2 pole VCF, Divine CMOS (sub-oscillator, harmonic divider, harmonic ring-modulator, pattern generator, all kinds of tricks!) Panel 2 - PMS VCO, PMS VCO, dual DC mixers, LDR VCA/mixer, dual LFO, utility EG "Panel 1 - bindubba 1 & 3 sequencers, multiples (banana to minijack connectors) nonlinearciruits has a YouTube channel so hopefully we'll see this one in action. Serge makes panels vs individual modules for example. For those not familiar with panel based systems, it just means all featured modules are in one panel rather than having separate modules that need to be racked together. Nonlinearcircuits has a post up on a panel based modular system he will be building. No post/effects or editing, strictly one take. Throughout the recording the cello is also mixed with the Synthi E in real time. In this piece, the cello provides proportional voltages which control various modules of the EMS Synthi E and at the same time is being filtered through it. Additional tracks below.Īnd some additional EMS tracks from Georgios Karamanolakis:įor Cello and Ems Synthi E. (rvrb,delay.0,5 ms).Ĭasio SK60 pic from here and EMS SYNTHI E from here. I realized I didn't have one and couldn't get myself to use the Speak n' Spell label. Note: I created a new Speech Synthesis label for this post. During a TED Conference talk, it took him seven minutes to answer a question." His speeches are prepared in advance, but having a live conversation with him provides insight as to the complexity and work involved. Hawking's setup uses a predictive text entry system, which requires only the first few characters in order to auto-complete the word, but as he is only able to use his cheek for data entry, constructing complete sentences takes time. In Hawking's many media appearances, he appears to speak fluently through his synthesiser, but in reality, it is a tedious drawn-out process. As of mid 2009, he was said to be using NeoSpeech's VoiceText speech synthesiser. Hawking is said to be looking for a replacement since, aside from being obsolete, the synthesiser is both large and fragile by current standards. Asked why he has still kept it after so many years, Hawking mentioned that he has not heard a voice he likes better and that he identifies with it. "The DECtalk DTC01 voice synthesiser he uses, which has an American English accent, is no longer being produced. He could easily change to a voice that was clearer, perhaps more soothing to listen to – less robotic sounding – but it wouldn't be Stephen's voice any more.'" The voice is one of the unique things that defines Stephen in my opinion. #Osculator mojave update#I am trying to reverse engineer it, which is quite tricky.'Ĭan't you update it with a new synthesizer? The company that made them went bankrupt and nobody knows how it works any more. There's a processor on it which has a unique program that turns text into speech that sounds like Stephen's, and we have only two of these cards. The card inside dates back to the 1980s and this particular one contains Stephen's voice. 'I guess the most interesting thing in my office is a little grey box, which contains the only copy we have of Stephen's hardware voice synthesizer. "Stephen's voice is very distinctive, but you say there might be a problem retaining it? Sam Blackburn answered the following questions regarding Hawking's voice synthesizer: Stephen Hawking is looking for a new technician.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |